Research note

Detecting timesheet variance without measuring people

A method for comparing approved schedules, recorded hours, and payroll lines, with exception classes and limits.

Published

Research note illustration for Detecting timesheet variance without measuring people
Table of contents

The question and the unit

This note tests a local question: where do recorded hours differ from the approved schedule, the leave record, or the payroll line, and what explains the difference? The unit is one worker-day. The method describes variance; it does not judge productivity.

Build the comparison

Join the schedule, the timesheet, the leave record, and the payroll register by worker and date. Record the time zone and the cut-off. Mark missing joins rather than dropping them.

Classify the variance

Use a small taxonomy: approved overtime, unapproved overtime, leave mismatch, holiday treatment, schedule change, entry error, and unknown. Unknown is a real category and should be reported.

Sample and reconcile

Take a stratified sample by week and by team. For each item, open the approval and the payroll line. Where the difference is a process issue, note the step that failed.

Report

Report the variance count, the value, and the class mix. Pair it with the number of items reconciled and the number still open. Do not convert the result into a performance score.

Limitations

The method depends on consistent records and may miss informal schedule swaps. It measures recorded agreement, not whether the work was useful.

Sources

References supplied with this research note.

Article source directory
SourcePublisherContext
ILO labour statisticsilostat.ilo.orgPrimary reference supplied with this article.
Philippine Statistics Authoritypsa.gov.phPrimary reference supplied with this article.
World Bank, World Development Indicatorsdatabank.worldbank.orgPrimary reference supplied with this article.