Philippines employment operations support

Candidate Sourcing Coordination

Keep candidate discovery, outreach records, and interview handoffs organized while your hiring team retains selection authority.

Illustration of a documented candidate sourcing pipeline and review queue

Who this is for

Hiring teams with a defined role brief but limited time to maintain sourcing activity.

Recruiting leaders who need a visible candidate pipeline across job boards, referrals, and approved talent pools.

The problem to solve

Candidate searches stall when criteria change without a record, outreach is duplicated, or promising profiles wait too long for review.

A coordinated queue gives recruiters a consistent way to capture source, status, follow-up dates, and hiring-team feedback.

Scope of work

The starting lane is deliberately explicit. Work expands only after the operating owner confirms that the instructions, access, review rhythm, and exception path are working.

Included work

  • Translate approved role criteria into search filters and sourcing checklists.
  • Record profiles, source links, contact status, and follow-up dates in the approved system.
  • Prepare interview availability options and maintain disposition reasons supplied by the hiring team.

What we need from you

  • Approved job description, required criteria, and acceptable location or schedule.
  • Access to authorized sourcing tools and the applicant tracking system.
  • Outreach templates, employer information, and named reviewers.

Workflow

The exact systems and cadence adapt to your operation, but every handoff keeps an owner, completion signal, and route for exceptions.

  1. Calibrate the search

    Review the role brief against sample profiles and record what qualifies, what does not, and what needs recruiter review.

  2. Build the candidate queue

    Search approved sources, remove duplicates, document evidence against criteria, and prepare outreach from approved templates.

  3. Route responses

    Update statuses, surface candidate questions, and send qualified profiles to the named reviewer on the agreed cadence.

Deliverables and operating evidence

Outputs are designed for review, not hidden activity. Your owner can see what moved, what is waiting, and what needs a decision.

  • Current candidate tracker with source and status history.
  • Review-ready profile summaries tied to the approved criteria.
  • Open-question, follow-up, and scheduling queue.

Boundaries and accountability

Administration can support a decision, but it should not quietly become the decision-maker. These controls keep authority with the right people.

Boundaries

  • The specialist does not promise employment, compensation, immigration support, or a hiring outcome.
  • Unapproved sources, sensitive screening criteria, and profile rejection decisions stay outside the coordination lane.

Quality controls

  • Duplicate check before a profile enters the queue.
  • Required-criteria check against source evidence.
  • Regular aging review for unanswered outreach and pending manager feedback.

Human decisions

  • Hiring managers approve role criteria, interview progression, rejection, compensation, and the final selection.
  • Recruiting leadership resolves ambiguous qualifications and changes to sourcing strategy.

Common starting scenarios

A useful first scope starts with a real operational constraint. These situations are signals that a documented coordination lane may help.

A recruiter has an approved role but needs consistent daily sourcing coverage.
Several hiring managers use one pipeline and need cleaner status ownership.
A sourcing sprint needs a documented handoff before interview review begins.

Frequently asked questions

Use these answers to test whether the service boundary matches the responsibility your team is ready to delegate.

Can the coordinator screen candidates?

The coordinator can check objective, written criteria and prepare evidence. A recruiter or hiring manager should make judgment-based progression decisions.

Can we start with one role?

Yes. One stable role brief is often the clearest starting point for calibrating sources, quality checks, and review timing.

What happens when a candidate asks an unapproved question?

The question is recorded and routed to the named recruiter rather than answered from assumption.

Related services

Related lanes can connect to the same evidence and handoff system. They should still have separate scope, permissions, owners, and review rules.